Skip to main content

Table 4 Findings from quantitative studies that reported factors affecting PrEP use (n=6)

From: Barriers to PrEP use and adherence among adolescent girls and young women in Eastern, Southern, and Western Africa: a scoping review

Author, year of publication

Population/study design/sample size

Country (ies)context

Key outcome(s)

Aim

Findings

Mayanja, Y et al. [58] Jan. 2019 to Dec. 2020), 2022

AGYW (14-24), prospective cohort, n=265

Uganda

PrEP initiation

Identify factors associated with PrEP initiation

PrEP initiation = 30.6% (n=81). Had 2–9 sex partners in past 3 months Vs 1 sexual partner (aRRk = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.20–4.63) and ≥10 partners (aRR 4.70, 95% CI 2.41–9.17), preferred oral PrEP Vs not (aRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08–2.19), separated/divorced vs single (aRR 1.55, 95% CI 1.04–2.33, p=0.002), aged 20-24 at enrollment vs 14-19 (aRR 1.07, 95% CI 0.74,1.54)

Primary reason for declining PrEP (n=184/265). 33.7% low HIV risk perception, 27.2% dislike for daily pills, 21.7% not ready, 12.5% preference for other methods (e.g. Condom), 2.7% side effects, and 2.2% stigma

Giovenco, D et al. [60] Oct. 2016 to 18, 2022

AGYW (16-25) randomized open-label PrEP trial, n=409

South Africa and Zimbabwe

PrEP use at 3 and 6 months

Effect of self-reported IPV in the year before PrEP initiation on adherence over the 1st 6 months on PrEP

<21 years: Evidence of PrEP use at 3 months no IPVl= 26.1% vs experienced any IPV = 11.5% (aRR=0.43 95%CI 0.22, 0.86; p=0.016)

>21 years: Evidence of PrEP use at 3 months no IPV = 16% vs experienced IPV 33.9% (aRR=2.21, 95%CI 1.34,3.66; p=0.002)

de Dieu Tapsoba, J et al. [61] Oct. 2018 and April 2019, 2022

AGYW (18-24) Cohort study; n= 336m

Kenya

PrEP discontinuation between June 2019 and January 2020

Factors associated with discontinuing PrEP

Factors associated with persisters but nonadherent vs. discontinued PrEP (n=144): older age >22 years (aOR 2.13, 95%CI, 1.01,4.49], p=0.048), more likely to be active in DREAMS program(aORn 3.85[95%CI 1.07 to13.82], p=0.039), think they would be at moderate-to-high risk of HIV if not taking PrEP (aOR10.17, [95%CI 5.14 to 20.13], p<0.001) and more likely to use injectable contraceptives (aOR 3.28, [95% CI 1.4 to 7.67], p=0,006)The primary reason for PrEP discontinuation (n=105): lifestyle demand (returning to school, being away from home)(30.5%), stockouts (24.8%), side effects, pill burden, pill packaging (24.7%), low HIV risk perception(18.1%)

Ohiomoba, R et al. [62] 2021, 2022

AGYW (15-24) Retrospective cohort; n=549

Kenya

PrEP discontinuation Mar 2017 and Dec 2019

Factors associated with PrEP stopping and persistence.

Common reason for stopping PrEP age >18, change in perceived HIV risk (22.3%) and relocation (20.5%) for AGYW age <18, a change in perceived HIV risk (56.6%), family refusal (11.3%)

Velloza, J et al. [63] 2016 to 2018, 2021

AGYW(16-25) a randomized open-label trial, n=423o

South Africa and Zimbabwe

PrEP use at Weeks 13, 26, and 52 post-initiation.

Time-varying depressive symptoms on effective PrEP use

55.2% of visits had detectable levels of PrEP among AGYW with elevated depressive symptoms vs 59.4% with no/mild depressive symptoms (aRR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.99; p=0.04)p

Sila, J et al. [59] Jun. 2017 to Oct. 2018 2020

AGYW (15-24) Survey, n=470

Kenya

PrEP initiation

Identify factors associated with PrEP initiation

Characteristics associated with PrEP initiation(n=20/470) Vs decline: had a partner of unknown/positive HIV status (qPR=6.05, 95%CI 1.83,20.01; p=0.003), condomless sex (last 6 months) (PR=1.21 95%CI 1.02, 1.44; p=0.033), alcohol use (past 30 days) (PR=2.17, 95% CI 1.43,3.33; p<0.001), unmarried/not living with a partner (PR=0.55,95%CI, 0.31,0.98; P=0.041), experienced IPV (PR=4.85, 95% CI 1.03,22.73; p=0.045),r high self-perceived HIV risk (PR=1.65 95%CI, 1.41,1.99; P<0.001), sthose with partner age difference >10 years (PR=6.57 95%CI, 2.35,18.370; P<001), had a partner who has other sexual partners (PR=2.31, 95% CI 1.83-2.92, p<0.001), high behavioral HIV risk (PR=1.75, 95%CI 1.24,2.46; P=0.001), high self-efficacy to take daily medication (PR=0.74,95%CI, 0.09,6.43; P=0.003), low social support (PR=2.01, 95%CI, 1.63,2.48; P<0.001), depressive symptoms (PR=5.36, 95%CI2.62,10.95; P<0.001)

  1. kAdjusted relative risk
  2. lIntimate partner violence
  3. m359 were enrolled in the PrEP program, but 336 were the focus of this analysis.
  4. nAdjusted odds ratio
  5. oMultivariable models adjusted for study site at baseline and time-varying data on the number of sexual partners, condom use during vaginal sex, any transactional sex, any IPV and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms
  6. pNumber of participants for the overall trial was 427, but 423 were included in the analysis for which results are presented
  7. qPrevalence ratio
  8. rN=388
  9. sN=358