Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Cervical cancer screening: a comparative study of TruScreen vs. Pap Smear

Original Submission
25 Jun 2024 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jul 2024 Author responded Author comments - Majed Alhudhud
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Jul 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Nov 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ragini Mehrotra
20 Nov 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 Dec 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye
9 Dec 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pakhee Aggarwal
10 Jan 2025 Author responded Author comments - Majed Alhudhud
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Jan 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jan 2025 Author responded Author comments - Majed Alhudhud
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jan 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Jan 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye
27 Jan 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pakhee Aggarwal
1 Feb 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dominik Pruski
10 Feb 2025 Author responded Author comments - Majed Alhudhud
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Feb 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Feb 2025 Author responded Author comments - Majed Alhudhud
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Feb 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 6
18 Feb 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye
18 Feb 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dominik Pruski
7 Apr 2025 Author responded Author comments - Majed Alhudhud
Resubmission - Version 7
7 Apr 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 7
8 Apr 2025 Author responded Author comments - Majed Alhudhud
Resubmission - Version 8
8 Apr 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 8
10 Apr 2025 Author responded Author comments - Majed Alhudhud
Resubmission - Version 9
10 Apr 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
11 Apr 2025 Editorially accepted
21 Apr 2025 Article published 10.1186/s12905-025-03733-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page