Table 1 Descriptive analysis of the evaluation data at T0
Category | Paper | Online | Exact Fisher’s test (two-sided) |
|---|---|---|---|
Scope range | n = 23 | n = 17 | p = 0.705 |
Too few questions | 4 (17.4%) | 1 (5.9%) | |
Adequate | 15 (65.2%) | 12 (70.6%) | |
Too many questions | 4 (17.4%) | 4 (23.5%) | |
Completion time [minutes] | n = 22 | n = 17 | p = 0.017a/** |
Mean | 7.18 | 10.35 | |
SD | 5.89 | 5.69 | |
Range | 29 [1–30] | 21 [4–25] | |
Coping | n = 23 | n = 17 | p = 1.000 |
Good | 18 (78.3%) | 14 (82.4%) | |
Poor | 5 (21.7%) | 3 (17.6%) | |
Clarity | n = 23 | n = 17 | p = 1.000 |
Good | 20 (87.0%) | 14 (82.4%) | |
Poor | 3 (13.0%) | 3 (17.6%) | |
Effort | n = 23 | n = 17 | p = 0.702 |
Low | 19 (82.6%) | 13 (76.5%) | |
High | 4 (17.4%) | 4 (23.5%) | |
In favor of routine interrogation | n = 23 | n = 17 | p = 0.425 |
Yes | 23 (100%) | 16 (94.1%) | |
No | 0 | 1 (5.9%) | |
Counter reason | n = 23 | n = 17 | |
No concern | 18 (78.3%) | 9 (52.9%) | p = 0.171 |
Data privacy | 4 (17.4%) | 6 (35.3%) | p = 0.274 |
General additional burden | 2 (8.7%) | 2 (11.8%) | p = 1.000 |
Additional health burden | 0 | 2 (11.8%) | p = 0.174 |
Lack of technical knowledge | 0 | 1 (5.9%) | p = 0.425 |
Suitability | n = 22 | n = 17 | p = 1.000 |
Good | 16 (72.7%) | 13 (76.5%) | |
Poor | 6 (27.3%) | 4 (23.5%) | |
Complexity | n = 22 | n = 17 | p = 0.318 |
Low | 13 (59.1%) | 13 (76.5%) | |
High | 9 (40.9%) | 4 (23.5%) | |
Laboriousness | n = 22 | n = 17 | p = 1.000 |
Low | 16 (72.7%) | 12 (70.6%) | |
High | 6 (27.3%) | 5 (29.4%) | |
Care improvement | n = 23 | n = 17 | p = 0.499 |
Yes | 21 (91.3%) | 17 (100%) | |
No | 2 (8.7%) | 0 | |
Reasons for improvement | n = 23 | n = 17 | |
Simplified communication | 19 (95.0%) | 13 (76.5%) | p = 0.702 |
Patient-centeredness | 9 (45.0%) | 7 (41.2%) | p = 1.000 |
Fewer emergencies | 2 (10.0%) | 5 (29.4%) | p = 0.113 |
Faster diagnostics | 13 (65.0%) | 11 (64.7%) | p = 0.747 |
Improved therapeutic concepts | 13 (65.0%) | 16 (94.1%) | p = 0.012** |