Table 2 Information extracted from studies
Author | Year | Location | Age | Total women sample size | Physical Activity | Prevalence of FSD in Active and Sedentary | Instrument |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cabral et al. [17] | 2014 | Brazil | 40–65 | 370 | YES:132 NO:109 | Active: 57.6% Sedentary: 78.9% | IPAQ1, FSFI2 |
Amidu et al. [20] | 2010 | Ghana | 18–58 | 301 | YES:109 NO:107 | Active: 73.2% Sedentary: 71.3% | GRISS3 |
Valadares et al. [21] | 2016 | Brazil | 45–60 | 749 | YES:250 NO:494 | Active: 32.9% Sedentary: 52.8% | SPEQ4 |
Çayan et al. [18] | 2016 | Turkey | ≥ 18 | 1217 | YES:308 | Active: 22.8% | FSFI |
Lutfey et al. [16] | 2009 | Boston Area | 30–79 | 3205 | YES:596 NO:891 | Active: 18.6% Sedentary: 27.8% | Self-administered questionnaire |
Maseroli et al. [15] | 2021 | Italy | 45.7 ± 12.3 | 322 | YES:105 NO:217 | Active: 62.1% Sedentary: 80.1% | FSFI, BUT5, MHQ6, FSDS-R7 |
Logan et al. [19] | 2021 | Singapore | 45-69 | 498 | YES:276 NO:276 | Active: 69.1% Sedentary: 71% | GPAQ8, FSFI |