- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Prevalence and factors influencing intimate partner sexual violence against women aged 15–49 in Kenya: findings from the 2022 Kenya demographic and health survey
BMC Women's Health volume 25, Article number: 74 (2025)
Abstract
Background
Sexual violence, a global concern, disproportionately affects women. In Kenya, over 40% of women experience intimate partner violence, reflecting a pressing need for understanding and addressing this issue. Sub-Saharan Africa faces a 18.7% prevalence with deep-rooted determinants like unequal power relations and cultural practices. Consequences from unwanted pregnancy to trauma hinder development goals. This study focuses on sexual violence among Kenyan women aged 15–49, aiming to inform policies and contribute to a safer, more equitable society.
Methods
This study analyzed 2022 Kenya Demographic Health Survey data. It used a two-stage cluster sampling method, surveyed 32,156 women aged 15–49, examined determinants of sexual violence, and employed statistical analysis to identify significant predictors.
Results
This study revealed several significant factors associated with the risk of sexual violence among women in Kenya. Educational attainment emerged as a key determinant, with women holding primary or secondary education showing higher odds of experiencing sexual violence compared to those with higher education. Desire for children also played a significant role; women whose partners desired more children had higher odds of experiencing sexual violence compared to those with mutual or differing desires for children. Domestic violence exposure was strongly associated with sexual violence, as women who experienced domestic violence had 8.69 times the odds of experiencing sexual violence. Additionally, partner alcohol consumption increased the likelihood of sexual violence, as did cultural attitudes, with women who believed that a wife’s refusal of sex justified physical violence facing higher odds of sexual violence.
Conclusions and recommendations
This study identifies key factors, including education, domestic violence, alcohol consumption, and cultural attitudes, that increase sexual violence risk. Recommendations include education, addressing domestic violence, promoting healthy relationships, and challenging harmful norms.
Introduction
Sexual violence is a pervasive and profound public health issue with far-reaching implications for human rights, health, and social well-being [1]. Globally, it stands as one of the most prevalent and distressing forms of violence experienced by women [2]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), sexual violence encompasses any sexual act, attempt to obtain a sexual act, or any act that leverages coercion to infringe upon a person’s sexuality, regardless of the perpetrator’s relationship to the victim or the setting in which it occurs [3]. This disconcerting phenomenon includes acts such as rape, defined as the physically forced or coerced penetration of the vulva or anus with a penis, another body part, or an object [4]. Women, in particular, bear a higher risk of falling victim to sexual violence [5].
Kenya, like many nations, grapples with the staggering burden of sexual violence against women [6, 7]. Government statistics from the Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) have revealed alarming figures, indicating that over 40% of women have endured physical or sexual intimate partner violence in their lifetime, with the lifetime violence prevalence standing at 20.5% [8]. These statistics underline the pressing need to comprehensively understand the nature and determinants of sexual violence in Kenya, particularly among women aged 15–49 [9].
Sub-Saharan Africa, as a region, also faces a significant challenge in addressing sexual violence, with an overall prevalence of 18.7% against women [10]. The determinants of this scourge are multifaceted and deeply rooted, often entwined with unequal power relations in society, cultural practices and ideologies, the control of women’s sexuality, and the objectification of women for pleasure [11]. These determinants shape the complex landscape of sexual violence, giving rise to myriad adverse outcomes, including unwanted pregnancies, psychological distress, increased vulnerability to HIV and sexually transmitted infections, alcoholism, suicidal tendencies, pervasive fear, anxiety, the shroud of secrecy, and long-term trauma [12].
These consequences not only undermine the fundamental human rights and dignity of women but also pose significant challenges to achieving global development goals as envisaged in the Millennium Development Goals and Kenya’s national aspirations outlined in Vision 2030 [13]. However, it is essential to note that the full extent of the burden of sexual violence and its determinants remains inadequately understood, often masked by poor documentation and underreporting [14].
The primary objective of this study is to shed light on the prevalence and determinants of sexual violence among women aged 15–49 in Kenya, drawing insights from the 2022 Kenya Demographic and Public Health Surveys. By conducting a comprehensive analysis, this study seeks to contribute valuable knowledge that can inform effective policies and measures to combat the challenge of sexual violence in Kenya and, in doing so, take meaningful strides towards fostering a safer, more equitable society for women.
Methods and tools
Study design and sampling methods
This was a complex cross-sectional survey that undertook a secondary analysis of Gender-based violence data retrieved during the 2022 Kenya Demographic Health Survey (KDHS) [15]. The survey was conducted from February 17 to July 31, 2022. Employing a stratified two-stage cluster sampling approach, 1,692 clusters were selected from the Kenya Household Master Sample Frame (K-HMSF) using equal probability selection (EPSEM). Among the initially chosen 1,692 clusters, which encompassed 42,022 households, one cluster in Mandera County was excluded due to security concerns, resulting in 1,691 clusters. The 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (2022 KDHS) was implemented by the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) in collaboration with the Ministry of Health (MoH) and other stakeholders. Funding for the survey was provided by the Government of Kenya, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Nutrition International, the World Food Programme (WFP), the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Clinton Health Access Initiative, and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) [15].
Sample size of the study
A weighted sample of 33,879 women aged 15–49 was recorded in the 2022KDHS dataset, This study included 15,269 women of reproductive rate who responded to questions related to sexual violence, encounters with sexual violence from any perpetrator, including current and former spouses or other intimate partners [15].
Variables of the study
Outcome variables
The dependent variable was sexual violence which was defined based on responses to the DHS survey questions. The questions usually enquire if the respondent has ever been subjected to any kind of sexual violence whether rape, forced sexual intercourse or other instances of sexual coercion. The relevant survey question(s) in the DHS dataset related to sexual violence typically include:
-
1.
“Ever been physically forced into unwanted sex by husband/partner(D105H)?“.
-
2.
“Ever been forced into other unwanted sexual acts by husband/partner(D105H)?“.
-
3.
“Ever been physically forced to perform sexual acts respondent didn’t want to(D105H)?”
These questions were then coded as binary (Yes = 1, No = 0) to create the outcome variable for instance, if a respondent responded ‘Yes’ to any of the questions, the outcome variable shall be coded as 1 (Every respondent who has ever experienced sexual violence). If the least number of affirmative answers was received from the respondent who answered the question as “No”, then the outcome variable will be coded as 0 which denotes no experience of sexual violence.
Independent variables
Possible determinants of sexual violence were; Age (grouped into; 15–19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49), Type of residence (rural or urban), Highest educational level( no education, primary, secondary and higher education), religion( catholic, protestant, African instituted churches, others), Husband/partner’s education level( no education, primary, secondary and higher education), Wealth index( poorest, poorer, middle, richer, richest ) employment status( employed, unemployed), number of household members( 10 and below, 11 and above), sex of household head male, female), partners desire for more children( both want the same number, husband wants more children, husband wants fewer children), respondent currently working( yes or no), a person who usually decides on the respondents healthcare(respondent alone, respondent and husband/partner, husband/partner alone), exposure to media such as TV, radio, newspaper( low, high), alcohol consumption by respondent( no, yes), partner alcohol consumption( no, yes), exposure to domestic violence(no, yes) and Beating is justified if the wife refuses to have sex with the husband( No, yes). Note: Employment status here refers to the broader categorization of the respondent as either employed or unemployed. This variable assesses whether the respondent is engaged in any form of employment at the time of the study, capturing their general employment situation. In contrast, the variable “respondent currently working” specifically examines whether the respondent is actively working at the time of the survey, focusing on their current involvement in the workforce, regardless of broader employment status.
Data analysis
Data cleaning and analysis were conducted using STATA 17 software. To account for unequal probability sampling across clusters and ensure representativeness, sample weights were applied. Descriptive statistics were used to determine frequencies and percentages, while bivariate analysis with binary logistic regression assessed associations between independent variables and sexual violence. Significant variables identified in the bivariate analysis were further examined in a multivariate logistic regression model. Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) and corresponding p-values were reported for the significant predictors of sexual violence. A significance level of p < 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied. The analysis utilized data from the domestic violence module of the Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS), which provided insights into intimate partner violence. The SVYset command in STATA was employed to account for the complex survey design, and sampling weights were applied to adjust for unequal selection probabilities, ensuring that the findings were both representative and statistically valid.
Results
Table 1 below summarizes the socio-demographic characteristics of 15,269 women aged 15–49 from the 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey. The majority (41.9%) were aged 20–29, with 69.6% married. Educational attainment was varied: 37.7% had primary education, and 20.7% had higher education, indicating potential empowerment issues. Most respondents (58%) lived in rural areas, and religious affiliation showed a significant Protestant presence (37.5%). Economic status revealed that 24.9% were in the richest category, while 32.8% were unemployed. Household dynamics reflected traditional structures, with 64.5% male-headed households. Additionally, 40.5% reported exposure to domestic violence, with 13.4% justifying violence if a wife refused sex. High media exposure (77.4%) may have influenced awareness of sexual violence.
Table 2 below shows that 10.4% of women aged 15–49 in Kenya reported experiencing sexual violence, while 89.6% did not.
The bivariate analysis in Table 3 below highlighted several significant factors associated with sexual violence against women in Kenya.
Women aged 40–49 (COR = 2.03, p < 0.000) and 30–39 (COR = 1.53, p = 0.001) were particularly vulnerable. Educational attainment played a crucial role, with those having primary (COR = 2.48, p < 0.000) and secondary education (COR = 1.79, p < 0.000) at higher risk, while higher education appeared protective (COR = 0.95, p = 0.691). Rural residence (COR = 1.16, p = 0.011) and being in the poorer wealth quintile (COR = 1.45, p < 0.000) also increased vulnerability. Employment was linked to greater risk (COR = 1.76, p < 0.000). Notably, alcohol consumption—both by respondents (COR = 1.91, p < 0.000) and partners (COR = 3.20, p < 0.000)—was a strong predictor, along with exposure to domestic violence (COR = 14.04, p < 0.000). Cultural attitudes justifying violence further exacerbated these risks (COR = 1.63, p < 0.000).
The multivariate analysis in Table 4 below showed educational attainment significantly impacted sexual violence risk; women with primary education (AOR:2.35, 95% CI: 1.22–4.54) and those with secondary education (AOR:2.13, 95% CI: 1.04–4.36) showed higher odds of 2.35 and 2.13 respectively than women with higher education. The desire for children influenced outcomes, with the partner/husband wanting more children (AOR:1.75, 95% CI: 1.28–2.38) than both partners wanting the same number of children and the husband wanting fewer children. Notably, exposure to domestic violence presented a striking odd of 8.69 than women who didn’t report any form of domestic violence (AOR:8.69, 95% CI: 5.85–12.91), indicating a strong association with current experiences of sexual violence. Additionally, partner alcohol consumption increased had increased 1.66 odds of experiencing sexual violence than when a partner doesn’t consume alcohol (AOR:1.66, 95% CI: 1.22–2.25). Cultural attitudes also played a role; the belief that beating is justified if a wife refuses sex resulted in higher odds of predicting sexual violence (AOR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.54–3.04).
Discussions
The findings of this study provided critical insights into the prevalence and factors influencing sexual violence against women aged 15–49 in Kenya, drawing on data from the 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey. The study found that 10.4% of women aged 15–49 in Kenya reported experiencing sexual violence. This figure demonstrates the persistent and significant nature of sexual violence in Kenya, consistent with findings from previous studies in similar settings. For instance, studies conducted in neighboring countries such as Uganda and Tanzania have reported similar prevalence rates, with estimates ranging between 8% and 15% [16, 17]. The relatively high prevalence rate in Kenya suggests that sexual violence remains a pervasive problem, despite efforts to address gender-based violence (GBV) in the country. While the overall prevalence is an important statistic, it is essential to recognize that underreporting may affect these estimates [28]. Many victims of sexual violence often do not report their experiences due to stigma, fear of retribution, or lack of trust in law enforcement [18]. Therefore, the true prevalence could be higher than what was reported. A related concern is that social desirability bias, where respondents may underreport sensitive experiences, could lead to an underestimation of the magnitude of the problem.
Educational attainment emerged as a significant factor influencing the risk of sexual violence. Women with primary or secondary education were more likely to report experiencing sexual violence. Interestingly, the risk did not significantly increase for women with higher education. This finding is in line with previous studies that have suggested a complex relationship between education and vulnerability to sexual violence. While higher education often provides women with greater autonomy and resources, women with less education may be more vulnerable to violence due to factors such as economic dependence, lack of empowerment, and limited access to support networks [19, 20]. The increased risk among women with primary and secondary education may reflect broader societal inequalities and norms that render women in these groups more vulnerable to violence. Women with higher levels of education might be less exposed to environments where such violence is normalized or may have better access to resources, legal recourse, and support services. However, as the current study did not find a significant relationship for women with higher education, further exploration is needed to understand this dynamic fully.
The desire for children was another important predictor of sexual violence, with women whose partners wanted more children exhibiting a 1.75 times greater likelihood of experiencing sexual violence. This finding aligns with research by [20] and [21] which suggests that controlling behaviours surrounding reproductive decisions, including coercion and violence, are often linked to a male partner’s desire for more children. In many cultures, including Kenya, gender dynamics and expectations around fertility can exacerbate violence against women, particularly when men exert control over women’s reproductive rights [22].
Exposure to domestic violence presented a striking association with sexual violence, with women who had experienced domestic violence being nearly nine times more likely to report sexual violence. This result is consistent with extensive literature demonstrating the intersection between domestic violence and sexual violence. Research by [23] highlights that women who experience physical violence are at a significantly higher risk of sexual abuse, with intimate partner violence often serving as a precursor to sexual violence. Domestic violence creates an environment where women’s autonomy is restricted, and they may be coerced into sexual acts or subjected to non-consensual sexual violence as part of broader patterns of control and abuse.
Partner alcohol consumption was also found to be a significant risk factor for sexual violence, with women whose partners consumed alcohol having a 1.66 times higher likelihood of experiencing sexual violence. The association between alcohol use and sexual violence has been well-documented globally, with research suggesting that alcohol use can reduce inhibitions, increase aggression, and impair judgment, all of which can escalate the likelihood of sexual violence [24, 25]. In Kenya, alcohol consumption is often linked to community norms around masculinity, where men’s alcohol consumption may serve as a proxy for aggressive or dominant behaviour, which can translate into an increased risk of violence against their partners.
Cultural attitudes about gender roles and marital relations also played a crucial role in determining the likelihood of experiencing sexual violence. Specifically, women who believed that beating is justified if a wife refuses to have sex was significant indicating that cultural norms and beliefs that tolerate violence in intimate relationships contribute significantly to sexual violence. These findings corroborate previous studies that emphasize the role of cultural beliefs in perpetuating gender-based violence [26]. In many societies, including Kenya, such attitudes are deeply ingrained and often perpetuate cycles of abuse, making it essential to challenge and change these harmful beliefs through public education and community-based interventions [27].
The findings of this study have significant implications for both policy and practice. The high prevalence of sexual violence underscores the need for more robust interventions at the community, institutional, and policy levels. The role of education in influencing sexual violence risk highlights the importance of addressing gender inequality and improving educational opportunities for women and girls. Policies aimed at increasing women’s educational attainment, especially in rural and marginalized areas, could be a critical step in reducing the risk of sexual violence. The findings on partner dynamics, particularly regarding the desire for children, domestic violence exposure, and alcohol consumption, call for targeted interventions that address male behaviours and attitudes [28]. Programs that work with men to challenge harmful gender norms and promote healthier relationships may reduce the incidence of sexual violence. Additionally, addressing substance abuse through public health campaigns and interventions can be a vital strategy in mitigating the risk factors for sexual violence. Future research should consider longitudinal designs that can better capture the causal pathways linking the identified risk factors with sexual violence. In-depth qualitative studies could also provide further insight into the lived experiences of women who face sexual violence and the contextual factors that contribute to their vulnerability. Further exploration of the role of men in preventing sexual violence and improving gender relations is also warranted. This study makes an important theoretical contribution by linking multiple individual, relational, and societal factors that influence the risk of sexual violence. It also offers practical insights for the design of targeted interventions aimed at addressing the root causes of sexual violence in Kenya. These findings have the potential to inform both policy development and programmatic responses aimed at reducing sexual violence and promoting the rights and well-being of women.
Conclusion
This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the prevalence and risk factors associated with sexual violence against women in Kenya. By identifying significant predictors such as educational attainment, partner dynamics, exposure to domestic violence, and cultural attitudes, the findings offer important directions for future policy and interventions. While there is much to be done to address the high prevalence of sexual violence, these results provide valuable evidence that can inform efforts to reduce gender-based violence and promote gender equality in Kenya and beyond.
Strengths and limitations
A key strength of this study lies in its use of nationally representative data, which provides a comprehensive understanding of sexual violence risk factors across Kenya. The large sample size enhances the generalizability of the findings, making them highly relevant for policymakers and practitioners. However, the cross-sectional design of the study limits the ability to establish causal relationships between the identified risk factors and sexual violence. Additionally, the reliance on self-reported data may have introduced recall bias or social desirability bias, as respondents may underreport sensitive experiences.
Recommendations
Our study on sexual violence in Kenyan women aged 15–49 offers crucial recommendations for addressing this issue. To create a safer, fairer society, we suggest: awareness programs, age-specific interventions, focusing on rural areas, collaborating with religious leaders, economic empowerment, supporting family planning, promoting shared healthcare decisions, continuous data collection, cross-sector collaboration, regular program assessment and legal reforms, accessible shelters for survivors, and further regional research. These steps highlight multisector collaboration and continuous evaluation’s importance in effectively combating sexual violence in Kenya.
Data availability
The data set used is openly available upon permission from the MEASURE DHS website (URL: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm).
Abbreviations
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
- KDHS:
-
Kenya Demographic and Health Survey
- K-HMSF:
-
HMSF-Kenya Household Master Sample Frame
- EPSEM:
-
Equal Probability Selection
- AOR:
-
Adjusted Odds Ratios
- KNBS:
-
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics
- MoH:
-
Ministry of Health
References
Jülich S, Thorburn N. Sexual violence and substantive equality: can restorative justice deliver? J Hum Rights Social Work. 2017;2:34–44.
Organization WH. World mental health report: transforming mental health for all. 2022.
Rollo T. Sexual consent and sexual violence.
Bitzer J. Sexual Violence. Textbook of Contraception, Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2023: p. 340.
Kreft A-K. Civil society perspectives on sexual violence in conflict: patriarchy and war strategy in Colombia. Int Affairs. 2020;96(2):457–78.
Nyambura C. Repoliticising women’s rights in development: young African feminisms at the cutting edge. Gend Dev. 2018;26(3):423–37.
Mwangoka A. The effectiveness of the gender desks in addressing gender based violence against women and girls in Kilosa, Tanzania. The Open University of Tanzania; 2022.
Stiller M, Bärnighausen T, Wilson ML. Intimate partner violence among pregnant women in Kenya: forms, perpetrators and associations. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):1–25.
Jamtsho C. Factors Determining Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Among Married Women in Bhutan. 2023.
Schrubbe LA, et al. Sexual violence and antiretroviral adherence among women of reproductive age in African population-based surveys: the moderating role of the perinatal phase. J Int AIDS Soc. 2023;26(6):e26129.
Govender N. Gender, sexuality and violence: an ethnographic case study of 12-13-year-old schoolgirl femininities at a primary school in KwaZulu-Natal. 2022.
Mumah JN, et al. Adolescents’ narratives of coping with unintended pregnancy in Nairobi’s informal settlements. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0240797.
Sangiovanni A. Humanity without dignity: Moral equality, respect, and human rights. Harvard University Press; 2017.
1Ajayi AI, Mudefi E, Owolabi EO. Prevalence and correlates of sexual violence among adolescent girls and young women: findings from a cross-sectional study in a South African university. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21:1–9.
KNBS. Demographic and Health Survey Kenya Summary Report [Internet]. 2022. Available from: www.DHSprogram.com.
Arias I, Sampson L, Sutherland M. Alcohol consumption and the risk of intimate partner violence. J Fam Psychol. 2009;23(1):38–45.
Devries KM, Mak JY, Bacchus LJ et al. (2014). Intimate partner violence and incident depression in women: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. PLOS Med, 11(5), e1001581.
Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, et al. Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the Philippines. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008;34(4):180–9.
Fulu E, Miedema S, Roselli T, et al. Pathways to and consequences of sexual violence against women in Kenya. J Interpers Violence. 2013;28(11):2303–25.
Foran HM, O’Leary KD. Alcohol and intimate partner violence: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(7):1222–34.
Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO Multi-country Study on women’s Health and domestic violence. Lancet. 2015;368(9543):1260–9.
Heise L. What works to prevent partner violence? An evidence overview. London: STRIVE Research Consortium; 2011.
Hatcher AM, et al. Unintended pregnancies, intimate partner violence, and reproductive health: a study in Tanzania. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):32.
Jewkes R, et al. Preventing intimate partner violence: a systematic review of interventions. Lancet. 2010;376(9751):83–93.
Kalimunda MB, et al. Gender-based violence in rural Uganda: a community-based study. Global Health Action. 2017;10(1):1377893.
Mbuya MM, et al. Education, gender norms, and violence against women in Kenya. Int J Soc Sci Stud. 2020;8(6):135–46.
Sikweyiya Y, et al. Sexual violence in Uganda: the role of education and risk factors. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1075.
Tenkorang EY. Gender and sexual violence in sub-saharan Africa. J Afr Stud. 2018;35(2):122–37.
Acknowledgements
We thank the DHS program for making the data available for this study. The authors also extend great thanks to the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) in collaboration with the Ministry of Health (MoH) 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (2022 KDHS) was implementing the 2022KDHS program.
Funding
No funding was availed to the authors to analyses and write up this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Emmanuel Asher Ikwara: Conceptualized the study, and led the data analysis, and interpretation, drafted and revised the manuscript ensuring alignment with the study objectives.Atwijukiire Humphrey: Analysed the data, led data interpretation and contributed to the methodology section.Kasande Meble: Assisted with the literature review, and the introduction section draftingIsaac Isiko: Revised the manuscript to align it with the study objectives and the study topic, data analysis and compiling the final revised manuscript. Wamani Gamukama Hannington: Contributed to findings interpretation and manuscript review, ensuring contextual relevance.Emmanuel Chiebuka Jacob: Contributed to data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We obtained authorization to utilize the KDHS dataset from the DHS Program website, available at https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm. The data provided by the Demographic and Health Survey has been carefully anonymized before their public release. The 2022 Kenyan Demographic Health Survey underwent a comprehensive review by the National Health Research Ethics Committee of Kenya (KHREC), ICF IRB and received approval.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ikwara, E.A., Humphrey, A., Meble, K. et al. Prevalence and factors influencing intimate partner sexual violence against women aged 15–49 in Kenya: findings from the 2022 Kenya demographic and health survey. BMC Women's Health 25, 74 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12905-025-03593-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12905-025-03593-7