Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitators to accessing post sexual-based violence health services among young women attending higher education institutions in Nigeria

Abstract

Background

Post sexual-based violence (SBV) services are crucial for mitigating SBV-induced consequences. However, these services are reportedly rare and often underutilized, particularly by young women in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to accessing post-SBV services among young women (18–24 years) attending higher education institutions in Nigeria.

Methods

An online survey, using a piloted questionnaire, was administered to a purposive sample of 114 participants recruited from social media platforms between the 8th and 22nd March 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the study findings.

Results

The majority (71.1%) of the participants were between the ages of 21 and 24 years. Of the 37 participants who indicated they have had their first sexual intercourse, a quarter (9, 24.3%) indicated it was non-consensual. Also, 1 in 5 respondents did not identify SBV/abuse as abnormal. Half of the participants (50.9%) strongly agreed that a post-SBV health service should be the first place to seek care following an incident of rape, however, over half (53.2%) reported a lack of awareness of existing post-SBV health services as a key barrier affecting access. Less than half of the participants strongly agreed that healthcare workers could provide the post-SBV services highlighted in the study, including emergency contraceptives to prevent pregnancy (42.9%) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to prevent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (39.6%), highlighting awareness gaps. Other significant barriers included stigma, shame, and a lack of support systems. Key facilitators included assurance of confidentiality and access to free post-SBV health services.

Conclusion

Significant barriers and facilitators affect access to post-SBV health services in Nigeria, particularly among young women. Multilevel efforts by families, civil society organizations, communities, and governments are essential to address these barriers and improve access to post-SBV health services.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Gender-based violence (GBV) is defined as “violence directed towards a person because of their gender or violence that affects persons of particular genders disproportionately due to structural and societal power imbalances” [1]. The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women identifies four major forms of GBV: physical, sexual, emotional/psychological, and economic violence [2]. According to a population study, at least one in three women worldwide has experienced physical, sexual, or other forms of abuse in her lifetime [3]. Violence against women, especially sexual-based violence (SBV) and intimate partner violence (IPV) represents a critical public health issue and a violation of women’s human rights [4]. In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), adolescents and young people face high rates of GBV [5], especially SBV during dating and this predominantly occurs in early adulthood [6].

Recognizing the importance of addressing GBV, a Kenyan study found that most GBV survivors were unaware of available GBV services and the need for treatment following such encounters [7]. Similarly, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, only half of the 85% of women who reported being survivors of sexual violence received any post-SBV healthcare services [8]. Mtaita et al. (2021) [9] emphasize the importance of healthcare access for GBV survivors, underscoring the crucial role it plays in reducing the impact of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) and preventing future occurrences. Despite this recognized need, underutilization of SBV health services remains widespread across SSA, with some African countries lacking any recorded access to these services [10]. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to accessing post-SBV healthcare services is therefore essential as a public health measure to better support SGBV survivors.

This study explored factors that facilitate or inhibit access to post-SBV health services among young women (18–24 years) attending higher education institutions in Nigeria. It addressed three research questions; (1) What were young women’s levels of knowledge about GBV and SBV health services in Nigeria? (2) What were their perceptions of post-SBV health services in Nigeria? and (3) what were the perceived barriers and facilitators to accessing post-SBV health services in Nigeria?

Methodology

Study area

The study was conducted in Nigeria, a West African country comprising of 36 states and a Federal Capital Territory (FCT), further divided into six geo-political zones. Nigeria has the largest population in Africa [11], with over 200 million people [12]; approximately 42.5% of the population is aged 14 or younger, and 19.6% falls within the 15–24 age range [13].

Study Method and justification

Study population

A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted among young women aged 18–24 years enrolled in higher education institutions in Nigeria. This age range was chosen because the research targeted undergraduate students in higher institutions.

Eligibility criteria

Eligible participants were young women aged 18–24 in their first to final year of undergraduate studies at Nigerian higher education institutions. Postgraduate students were excluded, as most young people aged 15–24, as defined by the United Nations (UN), are undergraduates in Nigeria. The study includes participants who have experienced violence as well as those who have not.

Data collection

Data was collected using an online questionnaire administered through Jisc online Surveys (formerly BOS), which was live from 8th to 22nd March 2022.

The first page of the questionnaire outlined the study’s purpose, introduced the principal researcher and included two screening questions on age (Are you currently aged 18–24?’) and educational status (Are you currently studying for an undergraduate degree in a higher education institution?’). Consent was also requested on this page. The questionnaire, written in English, took approximately 10 min to complete.

The study’s questionnaire was developed based on questions from three relevant studies conducted in Tanzania and Kenya with similar objectives [7, 9, 15]. The questionnaires from the Tanzania studies were adapted to assess respondent’s knowledge and opinion about GBV health services including barriers and facilitators to access such services, while the study from Kenya was used to develop questions on strategies to improve access to GBV health services.

The questionnaire included the following sections: a screening and consent section, a socio-demographic section with ten questions covering age, marital status, parents’ education level, and monthly allowance (collected as categorical variables). It also assessed participants’ knowledge and awareness of GBV and its health impacts, evaluated their understanding and perceptions of SBV health services in Nigeria, and explored barriers and facilitators to accessing these services.

An initial draft of the questionnaire was piloted with five participants to refine and inform the final version. While no changes were made to the questions or response options, the introductory information was revised to improve clarity.

Sampling and recruitment

A purposive sampling method was employed in this study, considering the limited time and resources available for conducting a postgraduate project. The limited time for data collection was a factor responsible for the study’s target sample size of 160. This sample size was informed by a systematic review [6] of similar studies that had sample sizes of female participants ranging from 100 to 300.

Participants were recruited by sharing survey links on social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Twitter where young people are typically active. The questionnaire was promoted weekly on these platforms. Ensuring representation from all six zones of Nigeria posed an anticipated challenge which was addressed by sharing the survey link through the corresponding author’s contacts, following referrals, and engaging with representatives from student, academic and religious groups within higher institutions nationwide.

Measures

Knowledge and awareness of GBV and SBV health services were assessed by counting participants’ responses (Yes, No, or Not Sure). Awareness of the four forms of GBV (physical, sexual, emotional, economic), as identified by The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women [2], was determined by counting the number of participants who correctly identified each form.

Perceptions of SBV health services were measured on a five-point Likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree). Additional analyses focused on barriers and facilitators to SBV health service utilization. The barriers and facilitators highlighted in this study were identified from the literature. These were also rated on a five-point Likert scale. For each barrier and facilitator, counts and percentages were reported.

Data analysis

Quantitative data was collected and analysed using Jisc Online Surveys (formerly BOS) statistical software, with counts and percentages reported for each response. Missing responses were handled by analyzing available data independently for each question, with the total (n) indicated per question. The results section presents a detailed breakdown of participant feedback and data analysis outcomes.

Ethical considerations

The research was conducted in accordance with the standard of the Usher Masters Research Ethics Group (UMREG) and the Academic and Clinical Central Office for Research and Development (ACCORD) of the University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Ethics approval was also obtained from the FCT Health Research Ethics Committee in Nigeria on the 14th of December 2021. The ACCORD sponsorship number is AC21183, and the Approval number for the FCT Health Research Ethics Committee in Nigeria is FHREC/2021/01/155/14-12-21.

Results

There are a total of 114 participants in the study. Response rates varied across different questions. Results for the socio-demographic, knowledge/awareness, and perception sections are presented.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants

Participants represented all six geo-political zones of Nigeria with the majority from South-Western (28.4%), North-Central, (27.4%), and South-Eastern, (23.9%) (Table 1). Most participants were single (91.2%) and the majority (59.3%) reported a monthly allowance above 10,000 Naira, with 76.8% stating that their allowance came from their parents. Regarding age at first intercourse, 39 participants indicated having had first sexual intercourse; 20.2% was between 16 and 20 years, 13.2% between 21 and 24 years and 1 (0.9%) reported first intercourse before age 16. Three quarters of these participants (75.7%) reported that their first intercourse was consensual with almost a quarter (24.3%) indicating it was non-consensual; 2 (5.1%) participants did not provide a response (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of participants (N = 114)

What are young women’s level of knowledge and awareness of GBV and post SBV health services in Nigeria?

Participants’ knowledge of the forms of GBV

Respondents were asked to identify violence that can be experienced in an intimate partner relationship. 89% of the 114 participants identified physical and sexual violence as an experience of GBV by an intimate partner. 78% of the participants identified emotional violence as an experience of GBV and just over a third (39.4%) identified economic violence as a form of GBV (Table 2).

Table 2 Breakdown of participants’ (N = 114) knowledge of gender-based violence (%)

Knowledge/awareness of SBV and its health impacts

In response to whether preventing SBV reduces HIV exposure, 72.6% of participants agreed, 11.5% disagreed, and 15.9% were uncertain. Furthermore, 94.7% believed that SBV could result in unintended pregnancies, while 2.6% either disagreed or were unsure (see Table 3).

Table 3 Knowledge and awareness of SBV and post SBV health services among the study participants (N = 114)

Awareness of strategies/services offered by a post SBV health service

Contraception

95.5% (n = 110) of the participants reported being aware of contraceptives. 26 participants reported having used contraceptives, representing 24.3% of all participants who answered this question or 24.8% of participants who were aware of contraceptives.

Emergency contraception

66.7% of the participants reported being aware of emergency contraception and 29.5% of participants reported they were unaware. 23 participants reported having used emergency contraception, representing 21.9% of all participants who answered this question or 32.9% of participants who were aware of emergency contraception.

Condoms

98.2% of participants reported being aware of condoms. 33 participants reported having used condoms, representing 30.8% of all participants who answered this question or 30.8% of participants who were aware of condoms.

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV

43.5% of participants reported being aware of PEP for HIV, with about an equal proportion (42.6%,) reporting they are unaware and the remaining 13.9% unsure. 2 participants reported having used PEP for HIV, representing 2% of all participants who answered this question or 1.9% of participants who were aware of PEP for HIV.

Concern about their health

Of the 39 participants who indicated they have had first sexual intercourse, more than three quarters (76.9%) reported they had been worried or concerned about their health during or after having sex with a partner. Of these 30 participants, 14 (46.7%) reported having sought support or spoken to someone about it, and 6 (20%) sought support from a SBV health service facility. (See Table 3)

What are young women’s perceptions of post SBV health services in Nigeria?

More than 80% of participants affirmed that post-SBV health services should be the first point of contact following rape, with 29.5% agreeing and 50.9% strongly agreeing. Over half of the participants (57.1%) believed that healthcare workers (HCWs) could help prevent SBV from recurring, with 33.9% agreeing and 23.2% strongly agreeing. Additionally, the majority (78.3%) of participants recognized the availability of HCWs to provide post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV prevention after rape, with 39.6% strongly agreeing and 38.7% agreeing (see Table 4).

Most participants (90.2%) affirmed that healthcare workers (HCWs) can provide linkages to psychosocial and counselling services for survivors of sexual and gender-based violence (SBV), with 42.0% agreeing and 48.2% strongly agreeing. Similarly, 93.8% of participants indicated that HCWs could facilitate access to legal aid services, with 49.6% agreeing and 44.2% strongly agreeing. When asked about the role of HCWs in evidence collection for forensic medical services (e.g., semen, blood, and hair samples), 92.9% of participants expressed agreement, with 46.9% agreeing and 46.0% strongly agreeing. However, fewer participants (84.9%) supported the idea that SBV survivors should access post-incident health services for treating physical injuries, with 40.7% agreeing and 44.2% strongly agreeing (see Table 4).

Table 4 Perceptions of post SBV health services among the study participants (N = 114)

What are the barriers and facilitators to accessing post-SBV health services in Nigeria

Barriers

A scale from 1 to 5 (with 1 being “not at all” and 5 being “very much”) was used to assess the extent to which nine barriers, identified from the literature, impact young women’s access to post-SBV health services (Table 5). Most participants rated “stigma/shame” (64.7%), “lack of support systems in the home, school, and community to facilitate visits to post-SBV health services” (54.9%), and “lack of awareness of existing post-SBV health services” (54.0%) as significant barriers (“very much”) impacting young women’s access to these services.

The next three factors that just under half of participants rated as significant barriers (“very much”) to young women’s access to post-SBV health services were “financial/cost of accessing services” (50.5%), “fear of reporting the offender” (50.0%), and “negative and unfriendly attitudes, including distrust of healthcare providers” (37.7%).

Around a third or fewer participants rated the final three factors as significant barriers (“very much”) to young women’s access to post-SBV health services: “fear of HIV testing” (37.7%), “difficulty accessing post-SBV health services due to the distance of the facility” (33.3%), and “belief that violence is normal” (25.4%). A minority of participants rated the first two factors as “not at all” important barriers (13.2% for “fear of HIV testing” and 10.6% for “difficulty accessing services due to facility distance”). Notably, one out of five participants indicated the “belief that abuse was normal,” was “not at all” important.

Table 5 Participants’ (N = 114) rating of barriers to accessing post-SBV health services (%)

Facilitators

A scale from 1 to 5 (with 1 being “not at all” and 5 being “very much”) was used to assess the extent to which six facilitators, identified from the literature, impact young women’s access to post-SBV health services (Table 6). Most participants rated each of the six suggested facilitators as significant (“very much”) in supporting young women’s access to post-SBV health services. The most important facilitator was “assurance of confidentiality after visiting post-SBV health services” (61.9%), while the least, though still highly rated, was “support systems in homes, schools, and communities to facilitate access to post SBV health services” (53.5%).

Table 6 Participant’s (N = 114) rating of facilitators to accessing post-SBV health services (%)

Discussion

This study examined factors influencing access to post-SBV health services among young women aged 18–24 in Nigerian higher education. The discussion addresses the three research questions on knowledge of GBV and SBV health services, perceptions of post-SBV services, and key barriers and facilitators to access. Findings are contextualized within the broader literature, with implications for public health policy and potential targeted interventions to improve service accessibility for young women in Nigeria.

Level of knowledge of GBV and SBV health services among young women in Nigeria

The study participants demonstrated a high level of knowledge about GBV, with 89% identifying physical and sexual violence and 78% recognizing emotional violence as forms of GBV. This awareness is likely influenced by their education level, as all participants are enrolled in a higher education. Supporting this finding, is a study that show a statistically significant association between the knowledge of GBV and level of education in the South-South region of Nigeria [16], and a Philippines study that show university students are extremely aware of all the forms of GBV [17]. Additionally, most participants reported that their parents had higher education, aligning with findings from SSA that associated higher education and household economic factors with greater GBV awareness [18].

While most young women identified sexual, physical, and emotional abuse as forms of GBV, 39.4% recognized economic violence as a form of GBV. This highlights the need for increased awareness and education among young women in Nigeria to close knowledge gaps regarding the various forms and definition of GBV.

The young women demonstrated awareness that preventing SBV is linked to reducing HIV risk and unintended pregnancies and showed high knowledge of contraceptives and condoms. However, fewer young women were aware of emergency contraception, and less than half knew about PEP for HIV prevention. This limited awareness may be linked to the fact that most surveyed young women were not currently sexually active, leading to lower consideration of their pregnancy and HIV risk and, consequently, limited awareness of these preventive measures. These gaps in knowledge about SBV health services could impact the utilization of these services, potentially leading to poorer outcomes for SBV survivors and negative mental and physical health outcomes [15].

Perception of post SBV health services

The young women generally perceived SBV health services as the first point of care following sexual abuse, with most agreeing with this view while very few disagreed. This aligns with their strong knowledge of SBV’s reproductive health consequences, such as unintended pregnancies and HIV risk. However, awareness of specific services like emergency contraceptives and PEP for HIV prevention was low, potentially impacting their perception of available SBV health services. The study also revealed limited confidence among participants regarding healthcare providers’ ability to offer essential post-SBV services such as PEP to prevent HIV, emergency contraception, and forensic services. Less than half believed that SBV health services should be sought for treating physical injuries. These findings suggest a need for greater awareness of post-SBV health services, which could improve young women’s perception and willingness to seek these services promptly following SBV incidents or rape [7].

Although the young women generally demonstrated a poor perception of the statement that HCWs can prevent SBV from reoccurring, a notable proportion agreed that HCWs can provide linkages to psychological counseling and legal aid services. This partially supports the idea that HCWs can play a role in preventing SBV recurrence [19]. Future studies may benefit from presenting this statement more clearly. Overall, however, participants showed limited confidence in HCWs’ ability to provide referrals to psychological and legal aid services, which could be instrumental in preventing repeated violence.

Barriers and facilitators in accessing post-SBV health services

Barriers

Stigma and shame were identified as the primary barrier to accessing post-SBV health services. In Nigeria, family and community members may perpetuate stigma, particularly towards young, unmarried women, who are often seen as promiscuous when they report sexual abuse [9]. Societal norms about the ‘appropriate’ age for sexual activities contribute to negative response towards SBV survivors. HCWs, civil society organizations, project implementers, and schools play a crucial role in addressing this stigma and shame [20]. These stakeholders can educate and sensitize communities about SGBV, emphasizing the importance of supporting survivors to speak up and seek help. Further, stigma can also be perpetuated by HCWs themselves, highlighting the need for targeted training to ensure consistent quality care at post-SBV services nationwide as a public health response.

The second most significant barrier to young women’s use of post-SBV health services was the lack of a support system at home, school, and within their community. A qualitative study in Tanzania supports this finding that 13 out of 20 participants relied on immediate family for emotional support, hospital accompaniment and financial assistance following SBV [9]. Community members also played an essential role when needed [9]. This underscores the importance of educating and sensitizing families, schools, and communities about their vital roles in supporting SBV survivors. Without this awareness, families and communities may respond inadequately to SBV cases, negatively affecting survivors’ emotional well-being and willingness to seek help.

The lack of awareness of existing SBV health services was the third most significant barrier to seeking post-SBV care. This aligns with a Kenyan study showing that most SBV survivors were unaware of available SBV recovery services [7]. Increasing awareness requires action from stakeholders such as civil society organizations, schools, HCWs, and government bodies, includes the Ministry of Women Affairs and the National Agency for the Control of AIDS. Awareness efforts could leverage effective channels like radio jingles, television adverts, and other outreach vulnerable groups, especially young women.

Facilitators

One of the primary facilitators identified by young women for accessing post-SBV health services was the assurance of confidentiality, which was the highest-rated facilitator in this study and aligns with the findings from the previously mentioned Kenyan study [7]. Ensuring confidentiality can be strengthened through capacity building and consistent and quality training for post-SBV healthcare providers, promoting quality and equitable care nationwide. Training should emphasize making SBV services survivor-friendly and maintaining confidentiality, as a breach of trust in this area can deter other survivors from seeking care [7]. This is consistent with a previous study that shows poor treatment of SBV survivors for example, failure to maintain confidentiality, negatively impacts post SBV health service utilization [21].

The second highest-rated facilitator was the presence of SBV health facilities within the community where people live. Expanding the distribution and availability of accredited SBV health providers can help address gaps in service access. Building the capacity of HCWs to offer specialized SBV health services, particularly in areas with high populations of young women, such as university campuses, could enhance access and encourage service utilization [7]. Increasing SBV healthcare coverage is likely to improve service uptake among those who need it.

Free or affordable GBV-health services were the third highest-rated facilitator for accessing SBV health services with participants identifying this as a crucial factor. This aligns with a Nigerian study showing that AGYW often face financial barriers limiting their access to these services [22]. Access can be improved by offering SBV health services at no or low cost, particularly benefiting young women who are enrolled in school, financially dependent on others or from low-income backgrounds.

Strengths and limitations of the study

This study provides valuable insight into the knowledge and awareness levels of GBV and post-SBV health services among young women in Nigeria, highlighting existing awareness gaps. It also identifies key barriers and facilitators to accessing these services, contributes to the body of knowledge and potentially informing public health policies and interventions. However, the study has limitations. A purposive sampling method was used, which, while suitable considering the time and resource constraints, may have led to a sample with similar characteristics, affecting the generalizability of the findings. The limited timeframe means that the recruitment may not have disseminated as far as it was intended to recruit more participants.

Another limitation of this study is its reliance on an online survey, potentially excluding eligible young women without internet access. Additionally, young women who are out of school were not included, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Further, women who have experienced violence may be less likely to respond due to the stigma they may feel, making who have chosen to respond an inherent limitation. It is important to highlight that the women recruited for the study were women 18–24 years and women who were older but may have experienced violence at the target age were not included. In addition, the sample size of 114 may not fully represent the estimated number of students enrolled, which could impact the result’s generalizability. However, this study is intended to serve as a foundation for a more comprehensive future study. Although responses were obtained from all six zones in Nigeria, only one participant was from the North-West and four from the North-East. Furthermore, data collection was limited to a three-week period due to delays and time constraints.

Conclusion

The study highlighted several barriers and facilitators affecting access to post-SBV health services. Key barriers included a lack of awareness of available post-SBV services and feeling shame or stigma. Facilitators identified included the assurance of confidentiality and the availability of free or affordable SBV health services. While young women demonstrated a good level of knowledge about GBV and its forms, awareness of the specific services offered by SBV health service was limited. Efforts to improve access to post-SBV health services in Nigeria amongst young women should focus on increased awareness of GBV and information about relevant support services. At a more strategic level, to address critical barriers such as stigma, national and regional policies should support targeted training for healthcare workers, aiming to enhance SBV care delivery, minimize stigma within healthcare settings, and improve the overall service experience for SBV survivors seeking support at challenging times.

Key recommendations include investing in education and awareness initiatives to inform individuals and communities about GBV, the available support services, and how to access them. Future research is encouraged to include young girls under 18, out-of-school young women, and those without internet access to broaden understanding in this area. Enhancing knowledge of SBV services is critical to mitigating risks such as HIV, unintended pregnancies, and other adverse outcomes, aligning with Sustainable Development Goal 3: Good Health and Well-being.

Data availability

Data was collected and analysed using Jisc online Surveys (formerly BOS) statistical software. This statistical software was provided by the University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom. The analysis involved reporting counts and percentages of responses for each question. Below is the link of the survey.https://edinburgh.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/gbv-health-services-pilot-survey-copy.

Abbreviations

SBV:

Sexual-Based Violence

GBV:

Gender-Based Violence

SSA:

Sub-Saharan Africa

AGYW:

Adolescent Girls and Young Women

HIV:

Human Immunodeficiency virus

HCWs:

Health Care Workers

PEP:

Post Exposure Prophylaxis

UMREG:

Usher Masters Research Ethics Group

ACCORD:

Academic and Clinical Central Office for Research and Development

References

  1. The UN Refugee Agency. Gender-based violence. https://www.unhcr.org/en-us/gender-based-violence.html. Date Accessed: Dec 16, 2024.

  2. European Institute of Gender Equality. (2021). https://eige.europa.eu/gender-based-violence/what-is-gender-based-violence/forms-of-violence. Date accessed: December 16, 2024.

  3. World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Violence against women. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women. Date accessed: December 16, 2024.

  4. WHO. (2024). https://www.who.int/teams/programme-for-gender-equality--human-rights-and-health-equity/about. Date accessed: December 16, 2024.

  5. Nyoni T, Steiner JJ, Okumu M, Orwenyo E, Tonui BC, Lipsey K, Mengo C. The use and effectiveness of the whole school approach in sexual-based interventions addressing gender-based violence in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023;24(5):3615–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabina C, Ho LY. Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014;15(3):201–26. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/1524838014521322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Njuki R, Okal J, Warren CE, Obare F, Abuya T, Kanya L, Undie CC, Bellows B, Askew I. Exploring the effectiveness of the output-based aid voucher program to increase uptake of gender-based violence recovery services in Kenya: A qualitative evaluation. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohli A, Makambo MT, Ramazani P, Zahiga I, Mbika B, Safari O, Bachunguye R, Mirindi J, Glass N. A Congolese community-based health program for survivors of sexual violence. Confl Health. 2012;6:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mtaita C, Likindikoki S, Mnjokava S, Mbita G, Safary E, Hilliard D, Jahn A. Accessibility to Gender-based violence health services for adolescent girls and young women in Tanzania. Int J Translational Med Res Public Health. 2021;5(2):125–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. García-Moreno C, Zimmerman C, Morris-Gehring A, Heise L, Amin A, Abrahams N, Montoya O, Bhate-Deosthali P, Kilonzo N, Watts C. Addressing violence against women: A call to action. Lancet. 2015;385:1685–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. UN World Population Prospects. (2021). https://www.prb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/print-at-home-2021-world-population-data-sheet.pdf. Date accessed: December 16, 2024.

  12. World Bank. (2023). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL. Date accessed: December 16, 2024.

  13. UNFPA. (2024). https://www.unfpa.org/data/world-population/NG. Date accessed: December 16, 2024.

  14. Popoola SI, et al. Data Brief. 2018;18:47–59. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.dib.2018.02.073. Date accessed: December 16, 2024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mtaita C, Likindikoki S, McGowan M, Mpembeni R, Safary E, Jahn A. Knowledge, experience and perception of gender-based violence health services: A mixed methods study on adolescent girls and young women in Tanzania. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8575.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ndep AO, Obidile VC, Akwafuo S, Ekwebene OC, Azubike CP, Umechinedu R-D, Obidile-Ikwegbu LE. (2022) ‘Knowledge and incidence of gender-based violence among young adults in the South-South region of Nigeria: A comparative study’, Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pp. Page range. Available at: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1821610/v2. Date Accessed: December 17, 2024.

  17. Bando D, Lumidao Y, Canuto PPL. (2024) ‘Campus voices: University students’ awareness of gender-based violence against women, girls, and children’, Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), pp. 1–16. Available at: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.0043. Date Accessed: December 17, 2024.

  18. Okereke GO. 2006. Violence against women in Africa. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies, 2(1), p.2.

  19. Arcidiacono C, Di Napoli I, Tuccillo F, Coronella F. Women and domestic violence in the professional experience of Italian general practitioners (IGP). Interdiscip J Fam Stud. 2012;17:79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hindin MJ, Fatusi AO. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health in developing countries: an overview of trends and interventions. Int Perspect Sex Reproductive Health. 2009;35(2):58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vetten L, Haffejee S. Factors affecting adherence to post-exposure prophylaxis in the aftermath of sexual assault: key findings from seven sites in Gauteng Province. Johannesburg, South Africa: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Odetola TD. 2015. Health care utilization among rural women of child-bearing age: a Nigerian experience. Pan Afr Med J, 20(1).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to the participants of the study, who supported the study by responding to the questionnaire. We also appreciate the USHER Institute, University of Edinburgh for their guidance and support in developing the study.

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AEO authored the manuscript text and led the data collection; ZEC was involved in the planning and developing of the data collection instrument. ZEC, OA, OB, ERIM, BMY, AO, MAG, and LEB finalized and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajoke Esther Ogedegbe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics Approval was obtained from the Academic and Clinical Central Office for Research and Development (ACCORD) of the University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom, and also the FCT Health Research Ethics Committee in Nigeria on the 14th of December 2021. The ACCORD sponsorship number is AC21183, and the Approval number for the FCT Health Research Ethics Committee in Nigeria is FHREC/2021/01/155/14-12-21. A consent form (see supplementary file) consisting of six consent points was provided for potential participants to read and decide whether or not to take part in the study. A page dedicated to informing the potential study participants about the purpose and benefits of the study was also attached to the questionnaire. Participants who consented to take part in the study ticked (Yes) and were directed to the online questionnaire page. Participants who ticked (No) were directed to the end (thank you page) of the online material.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogedegbe, A.E., Chen, Z.E., Adeagbo, O. et al. Barriers and facilitators to accessing post sexual-based violence health services among young women attending higher education institutions in Nigeria. BMC Women's Health 25, 193 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12905-025-03714-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12905-025-03714-2

Keywords